“The Weinstein Story was a solvent for secrecy, pushing women all over the world to speak up about similar experiences. The name Harvey Weinstein came to mean an argument for addressing misconduct, lest it go unchecked for decades, an example of how less severe transgressions could lead to more serious ones.”
On October 5, 2017, New York Times published a shocking
expose of influential Hollywood film producer Harvey Weinstein’s decades-long
history of sexual harassment, power abuse, and cover-ups. Times reporters’ –
Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey – relentless investigation of the Weinstein’s
disgusting misdeeds (Ronan Farrow in the New Yorker also simultaneously broke
the Weinstein story) among other things became the catalyst for #MeToo
Movement, first on social media (millions of women shared
their experiences of sexual harassment), and later led to protests, asking
deeper questions about sexism, gender inequality in the contemporary workplaces
and society. In She Said: Breaking the Sexual Harassment Story That Helped
Ignite a Movement, Kantor and Twohey chronicle how they set out to investigate
Harvey Weinstein, highlighting how their investigative methods, free from
sensationalism or ideological fervor, dealt the monumental challenges of ‘real
reporting’.
The investigative reporters’ work was bestowed with 2018
Pulitzer Prize in Public Service. But Kantor and Twohey’s reporting, like every
other news, did not happen in a vacuum. In fact, She Said opens with describing
the stormy sociopolitical climate (following the 2016 release of Presidential
candidate Donald Trump’s now-infamous ‘Access Hollywood’ tape) and the
precedent set by Times’ Emily Steel and Michael Schmidt who published an
investigative report on Fox News host Bill O’Reilly’s history of sexual
harassment. Megan Twohey has already worked on the story concerning Trump’s
treatment of women and his tax history, whereas Jodi Kantor has reported on
structural gender biases in the work places (particularly in the corporate
culture).
Kantor writes that, “Gender is not a topic, but a kind of
investigative entry point.” The entry point in the case of Harvey Weinstein is
provided by actress Rose McGowan’s tweet (in which she alleged that she had
been raped by a high-profile Hollywood producer; assumed as Weinstein). McGowan
didn’t take the matter beyond the tweet, and some dismissed her as a failed
actress trying to seek some attention. But even before McGowan’s tweet, there
were rumors of the producers’ predatory, sleazy behavior. When Megan Twohey
teamed-up with Kantor on Weinstein story, they tried to center their story on
the horrific experiences the A-list stars such as Ashley Judd and Gwyneth Paltrow
endured while working with the producer. The actresses were still uncertain about
going on-the-record. But then Kantor and Twohey decided to broaden the scope of
their story (on the insistence of their editor, Rebecca Corbett) by tracking
down former female employees who worked at Miramax and TWC; the women who
supposedly came in close contact with the producer’s ugly side.
As Kantor and Twohey collects stories of these women, a
disgusting pattern seems to emerge. The assault follows with threats and
payoffs. But although the reporters were made aware of gruesome accounts, they
couldn’t report it, since they had no one on the record. The list of women
abused by Weinstein was bound by confidentiality agreement. Some are just
terrified by the prospect of standing against a powerful film producer. Soon,
Kantor and Twohey themselves are warned of Weinstein’s mode of operation, whose
clandestine tactics and team of fierce lawyers do everything in their power to
stop the story going public. In this process, the Times reporters learn how the
wealthy repeat offenders like Weinstein exploit the weak sexual harassment
laws. The journalists observe that, “Some advocates for women profit from a
settlement system that covers up misdeeds.” Even female lawyers who are
supposed to be the defenders of women’s rights are proven to be part of this
system that aids high-profile abusers (silence in exchange for money).
She Said excels in offering a blow-by-blow account of how
the reporters gradually pieced together all the evidence – from on-record
testimonies of abused women sharing their experiences to including all the
incendiary E-mail and legal documents. The persistent yet delicate tactics
Twohey and Kantor employs to persuade the women to come forward is also impressively
noted. The most thrilling parts of the book involve the journalists’ &
editors’ confrontation with unruly Weinstein and his suave lawyers. In one
episode, we read the showdown on phone between Weinstein and Times executive
editor, Dean Baquet. By the end of this exchange, it’s made clear that the
producer’s years of bullying and harassing is coming to an end (although it
can’t be surely said if he is ever going to spend some time behind bars). She
Said, however, doesn’t end with the beginning of Harvey Weinstein’s downfall.
It goes beyond chronicling the nuts and bolts techniques of investigative
reporting and looks at the huge social impact of the story Kantor and Twohey broke.
In the third half of the book, the reporters jump to
Christine Blasey Ford story. Mrs. Ford reported an
alleged high school sexual attack on her by Supreme Court judge nominee Brett
Kavanaugh, who eventually was confirmed in office. Although Kantor and Twohey
only reported the Ford story from a distance, they offer a detailed account of
how the events unfolded. This might be less compelling compared to Weinstein
allegations, but the authors include the event to fit into the timeline, which
starts with Trump, Bill O’Reilly and culminated in #MeToo Movement. Kantor and
Twohey also addresses the backlash the movement received after it was labeled
as ‘witch-hunt’ directed against men. They emphasize on the need to verify and
check the allegations (a sort of structural change in the workplaces), and how
the movement has become extremely divisive (“In a way, those who felt #MeToo had not gone far enough and those who
protested that it was going too far are saying some of the same things: There
was a lack of purpose or clear enough rules. The public did not fully agree on
the precise meaning of words like ‘harassment’ or ‘assault’, let alone how
businesses or schools should investigate or punish them.”)
She Said has a kind of cathartic epilogue
which focuses on the gathering of 12 women who had been part of Twohey and
Kantor’s reporting at one time or other. The gathering takes place at actress
Gwyneth Paltrow’s house. Former junior employees in Weinstein Company and
McDonald’s worker Kim Lawson are part of this small circle. The episode wasn’t
as strongly written (the authors hint at the obvious class differences of the
women), but it stresses on the need to displace the culture of secrecy and compliance through simple communication and upholding a sense of camaraderie.
No comments:
Post a Comment